Hey there, San Miguel de Allende! Let’s dive into some juicy news about everyone’s favorite flying hero, Superman. The highly anticipated new film directed by James Gunn, with David Corenswet donning the cape, has sparked quite the buzz among fans. With everyone debating whether this latest version stays true to the comic book roots or takes a more modern spin, things are heating up faster than you can say “up, up and away!”
So, what’s the scoop? Well, folks are chatting about whether this new Superman is just a tad too pessimistic, perhaps a bit too progressive for their liking, and whether he’s still rocking those iconic red underwear over blue tights. However, amid these debates, there seems to be a consensus: Superman needs to be faster than a speeding bullet, stronger than a locomotive, and, of course, he must still have a soft spot for Lois Lane. Can’t have our Superman flying around without a little romance, can we?
Now here’s where it gets interesting. Back in 1938, when Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster first introduced Superman to the world in Action Comics, he wasn’t quite the squeaky-clean do-gooder we know today. Nope, he was more of a rebellious character—kind of a social justice warrior if you will. This Superman was all about righting wrongs, and boy, did he do it with some serious punch—literally!
Mark Waid, a comic historian, noted that the original Superman was much more of an “implacable force” who took the law into his own hands, taking down bad guys and corrupt officials with a fistful of justice. Waid went so far as to call him a “superanarchist!” Imagine that!
So, what caused the shift in our favorite Kryptonian? Paul S. Hirsch, author of “Pulp Empire,” found that the early Superman was almost like a “violent socialist.” He tackled issues like domestic abuse and corruption right out of the gate. This early portrayal had a powerful resonance with readers—two Jewish kids from Ohio who were frustrated with the injustices of their time and wanted to create a hero who could express their grievances.
But as time progressed, Superman started battling giant monsters and crazy scientists instead of social injustices. After WWII, the narrative became less about confronting real-world issues and more about the fantastical. And let’s face it—in the entertainment industry, when popularity skyrockets, things tend to soften up a bit to make sure no one gets offended!
So what’s the future hold? Well, with Gunn at the helm and discussions swirling like a tornado, it could go either way. Will we get a Superman who champions the oppressed once more or just another superhero flick filled with spectacular CGI and less substance? Guess we’ll just have to wait and see!
As we make our way to the theaters for this latest incarnation, let’s keep our fingers crossed for a return to form—maybe a splash of that rebellious spirit, a dash of social commentary, and, of course, a loveable Lois Lane keeping the charm alive.
So what do you think? Is it time for Superman to revisit his roots? Let me know your thoughts! Until next time, keep your capes handy and your eyes on the sky! Cheers!
Leave a Reply